VAGARIS.
01 — What this is

Understand your company. Move work forward. Verify the result.

Vagaris reads how your company actually works from the systems you connect — code, work, decisions, infrastructure — moves work through it under explicit authority, and checks each result against the system it changed rather than the report that says it did.

Understanding is built source by source. You start with one system, and Vagaris shows what it has read and what it has not, instead of claiming to know the whole company on day one.

Pre-GA Built for organizations of people and agents
02 — What it does

Three outcomes

Each one is something you can check, not a capability you have to take on trust.

01

Understand

Features, owners, dependencies and work in flight, read from the systems you connect. Every fact carries where it came from, and anything not yet read is shown as unknown.

02

Move

Work is proposed, anything consequential is gated by a person with the authority to decide it, and the approved action is re-checked against that authority as it runs.

03

Verify

A result is checked against the system it changed. The evidence is kept, so the next question about it is answered from the record instead of a fresh investigation.

03 — Who it is for

Use cases

One model of the company, read by each role for its own question. Marked in the product where it ships today in the pre-GA release, and in development where it does not yet.

Engineering

Where a feature lives in the code, what depends on it, and what is already being changed.

  • Feature map and per-feature pagesin the product
  • "Can I start this feature?" — an answer with its reasons, from what was readin development
Product

What was planned, what is in flight and what actually shipped — kept apart, because they are different things.

  • Product home, goals and roadmapin the product
Operations

What is running, what changed, and which decisions are waiting on someone.

  • Operations home, approvals and infrastructure viewsin the product
Executives

Where the work stands, with the evidence behind it rather than a status summary of it.

  • Organization overview and evidencein the product
04 — An example

One question, answered from the record

Illustrative. The company and its details are invented to show the shape of an answer.

Example company: Kestrel Freight (fictional)

"Is the new delivery-window feature safe to start?"

  1. It touches the scheduling service and the customer notifications it sends.
  2. Another team has open work on that scheduling service, so the overlap is named, with its owner.
  3. One dependency has not been connected yet, so its part of the answer is shown as unknown rather than assumed safe.
05 — Guarantees

What it refuses to do

A system that only describes what it can do tells you nothing about what happens on a bad day. These are the refusals, and they are enforced in the execution path rather than documented as intent.

arming expires
Permission to act carries an expiry. When it lapses the seam refuses, and the refusal is the default — nothing has to be remembered or revoked by hand.
verb denylist
Named actions can be withheld from an AI teammate outright. A malformed rule fails closed for that teammate rather than silently widening it.
scope limits
An AI teammate acts only inside the domains it was granted. Scope is re-read at execution, so narrowing it takes effect immediately.
append-only record
The event log is the source of truth and is never edited in place. What is rendered for humans to read is a projection of it, not the record itself.
delivery, not hope
Work that must reach another system is written to an outbox and retried until it is accepted. A transport failure delays delivery; it does not lose it.
06 — Start

Start with Vagaris

Create your account and connect your first system. If you would rather talk it through first — what to connect, who should have authority — send the form below and we will reply.

Start with Vagaris →

Pricing is not published because it is not set — this is a pre-GA product, and quoting a number we have not decided would be worth less than saying so.